Bharat Biotech Vaccine
Fair Pharma Scorecard
Applying human rights to pharma
Menu
Click on ‘Explanation about the score’ sign next to each entry to expand and learn more.
The company should publicly commit to human rights in relation to product development and marketing, by adopting an official human rights policy statement recognising the right to the highest attainable standard of health. The company should endeavour to integrate human rights into its strategies, policies, programmes, projects, and activities.
The company should also have a publicly available global access plan for their Covid-19 product, based on human rights standards, with measurable targets and lines of accountability.
Pfizer has pledged 2 billion doses to LMICs in 2022; through 64 direct supply agreements (more than half of which in LMICs), 40 million doses to Covax, and 240 million doses donated to 87 countries. It also states that it collaborates with Covax on supply chain capability analysis, freezer donation to support cold chain capacity through a UPS partnership, and drone-assisted deliveries to ensure that vaccines reach hard-to-reach areas. It also mentions 30 million dollars in grants to meet the needs of front line healthcare workers during the pandemic, and a targeted vaccine donation programme for vulnerable populations. Finally, Pfizer has adopted a tiered pricing strategy for its Covid-19 vaccine.
Pfizer has a detailed human rights statement on its website, which includes adherence to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
The company should constructively engage with international initiatives for the equitable distribution of vaccines and therapeutics, such as the Covid-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) or the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP), and the ACT Accelerator (COVAX). The company should also publicly commit to not enforcing the exclusive rights of Covid-19 related patents, and enter into non-exclusive, transparent licensing agreements for its Covid-19 products with other companies.
Pfizer stated in their response to our questionnaire: ‘As mentioned above, experience has shown that the challenges of ensuring fair distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine are not due to the IP system, but rather to the tight vaccine supply stocks at the start of the pandemic, export controls & other barriers to trade in vaccines and supplies and restrictions on distribution infrastructure that determine country preparedness, among other factors. As such, we do not believe that relinquishing intellectual property rights will bring the world closer to fair access. It would be more likely to hinder innovation and collaboration when it is most needed.’ However, Pfizer has since signed a deal with the MPP for its antiviral treatment Paxlovid.
Pfizer does not commit to not enforcing its patent rights.
Pfizer has pledged a total of 1.040.000.000 doses to COVAX.
In its response to our questionnaire, Pfizer stated that “Pfizer and BioNTech’s global supply chain and manufacturing network for the COVID-19 vaccine now spans four continents and includes more than 20 manufacturing facilities, including contract manufacturing agreements that Pfizer has entered into to further accelerate access around the world. Last July, we announced a groundbreaking agreement with the Biovac Institute in South Africa to manufacture the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 vaccine exclusively for the 55 member states that make up the African Union. And in August, Pfizer and BioNTech also announced the signing of a letter of intent with Eurofarma Laboratórios SA, a Brazilian biopharmaceutical company, to manufacture our COVID-19 vaccine for distribution in Latin America.” However, these contracts are fill-and-finish sites, which does not involve transferring the license to make the mRNA vaccine.
The company should engage in efforts to further equitable distribution of Covid-19 vaccines/therapeutics, by equitably distributing its supplies globally, devising fair pricing strategies, and making the active ingredient for its product available to other manufacturers. The company should also engage in full technology transfer to other manufacturers, including the necessary transfer of skills, legal components, knowledge and intellectual property. Where applicable, the company should agree to waive rights in regulatory test data, and refrain from enforcing TRIPS+ measures.
[Only applies to therapeutics]
Pfizer does not commit to full technology transfer to other companies – see C4.
Pfizer states that it will make a small profit from the vaccine. In its response to our questionnaire, it states: ‘High- and middle-income countries will pay more than low-income countries. Low and lower middle-income countries will pay a non-profit price’ and ‘for the 92 lowest-income countries, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), we offer our vaccine at cost. That’s why we announced to Gavi, CEPI and WHO that we want to supply vaccines to their COVAX facility. ’ Pfizer has adopted a tiered pricing strategy for its vaccine.
As of 11th February 2022, Pfizer has sold 66.25% of its doses to high-income countries.
Pfizer’s vaccine represents 72% of all doses administered globally, but the company has sold less than 1% of its production to LICs.
Pfizer states in its response to our questionnaire: “In 2021, we delivered on our promise and supplied over 1 billion doses of our vaccine to 99 low- and middle-income countries. This includes more than 400 million doses, or approximately 40% of this supply, that have reached 56 low- and lower-middle-income countries. Thanks to the efforts of all stakeholders, COVAX was able to dramatically increase the rate of vaccine deliveries at the end of 2021. Pfizer and BioNTech have pledged to deliver another billion doses of our COVID-19 vaccine to low- and middle-income countries in 2022.”
See https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations; https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/pfizer-biontech-and-moderna-making-1000-profit-every-second-while-worlds-poorest.
No information on this criterion was found.
No information on this criterion was found.
The company should be as transparent as possible, by publishing its research and development costs, profit margin, average costs of production, and production capacity for its Covid-19 product. It should also disclose the amount of public subsidies received during product development and/or testing. Licensing agreements should also be made publicly available and clinical trials should be registered in public repositories.
Pfizer states in its Q4 2021 report that its research and development expenses increased by 77% compared with the prior-year quarter, partly reflecting collaboration agreements signed with BioNTech. The expenses published are not specific to the Covid-19 vaccine, however.
Pfizer states in its Q4 2021 report (p4) that it anticipates 32 billion US dollars of revenue for Comirnaty, but does not mention a margin.
Pfizer does not publish the average and/or marginal costs of producing the vaccine.
Pfizer expects to produce 4 billion doses in 2022.
Pfizer CEO Bourla said in an interview with TIME that Pfizer is not taking any public money at all. No information from press releases.
Pfizer has not published any licensing agreement texts so far.
Pfizer has registered its clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov
Never miss an update from the Pharmaceutical Accountability Foundation!
